Everyone talks about price. Very few talk about how users perceive value. It’s a subtle, invisible currency: the difference between “expensive” and “a good deal.” Displaying the exact amount a user will save, whether in dollars, percentage, or both — is one of those small levers that, when tested rigorously, can produce outsized effects on conversion.
This is not about slapping a discount banner on your product. It’s about framing the decision so that the user sees opportunity instead of cost, gain instead of loss, benefit instead of friction.
Using GemX, you can measure not just whether it works, but why it works for different visitor segments, and learn something about human behavior in the process.
The Core Idea: Framing Savings as Cognitive Leverage
Think about it. When someone hesitates over a purchase, what are they really doing? They’re weighing risk against reward, often unconsciously. They are asking: “Will I regret this?” or “Am I getting enough for my money?”
When you show the precise savings: “Save $50 today” or “20% off this plan” — you tip the balance. You make the reward salient. You make the value concrete. The number acts as a cognitive anchor, a mental shortcut, helping the user justify their decision before doubt creeps in.
The savings message is the simplest form of persuasion you can implement: no fancy UX patterns, no radical redesigns. Yet its strategic placement and precision can dramatically reduce hesitation.
Why This Works: Behavioral Insights
We’re not running a psychology lecture. We’re observing behavior.
Here’s why savings messaging works:
1. Loss Aversion Framing
Humans hate losing more than they like winning. When you show someone they can avoid spending extra by acting now, you are appealing to this natural bias.
-
“Pay $200 now or lose $50 in savings” is a subtle nudge.
-
The focus shifts from the absolute price to avoiding a lost opportunity, which accelerates decision-making.
2. Anchoring and Contextual Comparison
Savings messaging doesn’t exist in isolation. Its power comes from context.
-
Original price: $250
-
Discounted price: $200 → Save $50
The $250 is now the anchor, the reference point. The visitor doesn’t just see $200. They see $50 gained, which changes their perception of value instantly.
-
Absolute vs. percentage savings: Both work differently. $50 off a $200 product feels tangible. “20% off” works better for higher-ticket items, or when comparing multiple options.
Strategically, testing both formats is critical. Don’t assume one works universally — perception depends on the price point, audience, and context.
3. Decision Simplification
Decision-making is costly. The more steps a visitor has to mentally calculate, the more friction accumulates. Explicit savings messaging removes mental load.
-
No need for them to do math in their head.
-
They immediately see the benefit.
-
Choice architecture subtly pushes them toward the higher-value option.
This is where CRO intersects with human behavior: small nudges reduce cognitive effort, which reduces abandonment and increases conversion.
4. Timing and Placement Matter
Where you show savings is as important as what you show. Above the fold, next to the CTA, or alongside pricing tiers, the savings cue:
-
Signals value early in the decision path
-
Reduces hesitation at the micro-decision level
-
Reinforces perceived fairness and transparency
Misplaced savings messages — hidden below the fold, or buried in fine print — lose impact. The brain ignores what it cannot easily see.
When to Test Savings Messaging
This is not a tactic for every page. It matters when:
-
You have tiered pricing, subscription bundles, or recurring offers.
-
Price is a primary friction point.
-
You have enough traffic to detect subtle but meaningful lifts (≥10K monthly visitors).
-
You’re ready to capture segment-level insights: new vs. returning visitors, mobile vs. desktop, paid vs. organic traffic.
Avoid testing if:
-
Discounts are negligible and won’t move perception.
-
Pricing is inconsistent, which risks credibility.
-
Other major page changes are live — you won’t know what drives movement.
Hypothesis and Experiment Design
Hypothesis (IF–THEN–BECAUSE)
|
IF we show the exact amount users will save, THEN the conversion rate will increase, BECAUSE the product is perceived as less expensive, the gain is tangible, and the user sees immediate value. |
A/B Testing Setup with GemX — How to Build This Test
Below is a practical step-by-step for recreating this test in GemX, tuned to produce defensible insights.
Step 1: Select the Control Template
Choose the live product or pricing page currently used as the baseline. This is Version A (Control): the exact page users are seeing now, without explicit savings messaging (or with your current approach).
In GemX: Create New Experiment → Template Testing → Set Control Template to the live page.
Step 2: Select Variant Template
Create one or more variants. If you use GemPages, use Create Variant based on Control in GemX and edit the copy in-place. If you use another builder, please prepare the templates beforehand.
Example variants for a $250 product:
-
Control: Price shown as “$200” (sale) with no explicit savings line.
-
Variant A: Display “$200” and subtext “Save $50 today”.
Keep images, offers, and buttons identical. The only allowed differences are savings formatting and placement.
Step 3: Configure Advanced Experiment Settings
1. Winning Metric
Recommended: Conversion
Why: Savings messaging primarily affects the decision to buy. Use conversion as the primary metric to avoid conflating copy effects with average order volatility. Track revenue as a secondary metric to detect any downstream changes (e.g., if savings increases conversion but reduces average order value).
2. Device Targeting
Recommended: All devices
Why: Savings messaging should be tested across the full funnel. However, mobile users may need shorter phrasing; segment analysis will reveal device-specific winners.
3. Visitor Type
Recommended: Run both visitor types
Why: New visitors make top-of-funnel decisions where explicit savings can be decisive. Returning users may have prior price knowledge and loyalty; they’re useful for validating longer-term perceptions but can obscure first-impression effects.
4. Traffic Source
Recommended: Paid search + Organic search
Why: Search traffic arrives with intent, they’re actively comparing price and features, so savings clarity matters. Paid search is especially price-sensitive; Organic search shows how natural discovery responds. Paid social tests whether savings messaging also persuades emotionally-driven, low-intent visitors.
5. Traffic Split
Recommended: 50/50.
Why: Balanced exposure provides clean statistical comparisons and avoids sequence bias.
6. Market & Language
Recommended: Start with your primary market and currency (e.g., US / USD). Localize and re-run for additional markets.
Why: Dollar amounts carry different psychological weight across geographies. “Save $50” in the US may be meaningful; in another market it may be meaningless or require localization (currency, phrasing, cultural tone).
Once you’ve configured these options, save your setup and launch the experiment.
Expert Tips: How to Show Savings More Effectively on Your Page
Small UX choices change results. Here are concrete, battle-tested recommendations.
Absolute vs Percentage (or both)
-
Use absolute dollars when the dollar difference is meaningful and easy to grasp. "$50" is concrete.
-
Use percentages when discounts are proportionally larger (e.g., 30–50% off) or when comparing across tiers.
-
Display both when it’s helpful: show “Save $50 (20%)” to cover both intuitive and proportional understanding.
Currency & Rounding
-
Localize currency automatically.
-
Round savings to sensible numbers: don’t show “Save $49.37” — prefer “Save $49” or “Save $50.” Clean rounding feels credible and easier to process.
Placement
-
Hero / CTA-adjacent for immediate impact: place savings copy next to the primary CTA.
-
Pricing tables: show savings per tier and per billing interval (monthly vs yearly).
-
Cart & checkout: repeat savings messaging to reduce cart abandonment.
Dynamic Savings
-
For subscriptions, show annualized savings clearly: “Save $120/year” is often more persuasive than monthly savings.
-
If using promo codes, show the applied discount and the pre- and post-discount totals.
Wording & Tone
-
Try “Save $X today” vs “You’ll save $X” vs “Save $X (limited time)” to find the most effective phrase. Test urgency sparingly and ethically.
Transparency & Guardrails
-
Never hide conditions (taxes, shipping). Hidden costs destroy trust and increase refunds.
Interpreting Results & Next Steps
When the experiment reaches statistical confidence, don’t stop at “which variant won.” Ask why and where.
Statistical vs Practical Significance
A 0.2 percentage point lift may look small but can be large in dollars. Convert lifts into revenue impact (AOV × traffic × lift) to assess commercial value.
Segment-Level Insights
-
New vs returning: Does savings messaging primarily help first-time buyers?
-
Paid vs organic: Are paid search users most sensitive to absolute savings?
-
Mobile vs desktop: Does short, punchy savings copy win on mobile?
Use these insights to personalize experiences — for example, show absolute dollar savings to paid search visitors and percentage savings in email campaigns for high-ticket buyers.
Behavioral Trade-Offs
Watch for:
-
Reverse signaling: overly large discounts can suggest low quality. If savings increase conversions but lead to higher returns or complaints, re-evaluate messaging.
-
Cannibalization: if savings only move purchase timing (customers who would buy anyway now buy during sale), the net new revenue might be smaller than expected. Use cohort analysis.
Iterate
-
Test placement (hero vs pricing table).
-
Test phrasing and verbs.
-
Combine savings messaging with social proof (“Save $50 — trusted by 10,000 customers”).
-
Run sequential tests to converge on an optimal multi-channel messaging system.
